Building Real Relationships With Foundation Program Officers
For a lot of us, applying for a grant feels like sending a letter into a locked building. You research the foundation, write the strongest proposal you can, hit submit before the deadline, and then you wait. Weeks go by. Maybe months. When the answer finally comes back, it is almost always a form email with no explanation and no sense of whether you were close or never in the running at all. The whole thing can feel anonymous on purpose, like the funder built a wall to keep you on the other side of it.
Here is what I have learned, and it changed how I think about grants entirely. On the other side of that wall is a person. That person has a name, a job, and a genuine interest in finding good organizations to fund. They are called a program officer, and building real relationships with foundation program officers may be the single highest-return thing a development office can do — higher than another draft of the narrative, higher than a slicker budget. The proposal still matters. But it lands on the desk of someone who already knows you, or someone who has never heard your name, and those are two very different odds.
Why the Relationship Moves the Money
Let me start with the numbers, because they make the case better than I can. Across all grant applications, the average success rate sits at around 15%. That is the ordinary outcome of a cold submission — five out of six come back as a no, and most of the time you never learn why. If your only strategy is to write well and wait, you have signed up for those odds.
Now look at what changes when a funder already knows you. Grant writers applying to foundations that have never heard of the organization tend to see success rates around 30 to 40%, while applications to funders that already know the organization land closer to 80%. That is not a small bump. It is the difference between a one-in-three shot and a four-in-five shot, and the thing separating them is relationship. The funder in the second group has context. They have a face to put with the request. They have some reason to trust that the money will do what you say it will.
The research backs this up beyond any one grant writer's experience. The Center for Effective Philanthropy studied nearly 20,000 grantees across 86 foundations and found that one of the best predictors of success in philanthropy is the strength of the relationships a foundation has with its grantees. Strong relationships, defined by clear communication and genuine understanding, tracked with grantees who felt the funding actually helped their work. When you build a relationship with a program officer, you are not gaming the system. You are giving the funder the kind of connection their own field says produces better outcomes.
What a Program Officer Actually Is (and Isn't)
A program officer is the person inside the foundation who manages a portfolio of grants and serves as the front line for organizations seeking funding. They review applications, make or shape funding recommendations, and often carry real influence over which proposals move forward. It is easy to picture them as a gatekeeper whose main job is to keep you out. I understand the instinct, because the process can feel that way. But it gets the relationship exactly backwards.
Most program officers are trying to do the same thing you are. They are looking for strong organizations doing work that fits their foundation's priorities, and a good fit makes their job easier, not harder. The team at Funding for Good puts it plainly in their guidance on how to start the conversation with program officers: these people are a resource, not an obstacle, and developing a relationship with them should be a top priority for any grant writer. When a program officer asks you a hard question, they are usually not trying to trip you up. They are trying to figure out whether they can help you, and whether your work belongs in front of their board.
This reframe lowers the stakes of reaching out. You are not auditioning for a skeptical judge. You are starting a working conversation with a colleague who happens to control a budget. That does not mean you can be careless with their time — quite the opposite. It means the door is more open than it looks, and the way through it is to be genuinely useful and genuinely prepared.
Turning that outreach into a repeatable rhythm — a short research routine, a first-contact email you can adapt, a set of questions you ask every program officer — is exactly the kind of system that keeps relationship-building from falling to the bottom of a busy week.
Want to develop your fundraising skills? Take a look at my Claude Skills page.
Explore the Skills
How to Start the Relationship Before You Apply
The best time to reach out to a program officer is before you submit a proposal, not after. A short conversation early tells you whether the foundation is actually a match, and it lets the officer put a mission to your name before your application is one of a hundred in the stack. Unless a funder explicitly says not to contact them, reaching out is both acceptable and, in most cases, wise.
The key is to earn the conversation by doing your homework first. Before you email anyone, you should already know the foundation's priorities, have read their website and their most recent tax filings, and be clear on how a specific program of yours aligns with what they fund. This is the same fit work that goes into finding the right grant funders for your nonprofit in the first place — the relationship is only worth building if the match is real. A cold, vague message to a funder who does not fund your issue or your geography does not start a relationship. It ends one before it begins.
When you are ready to make contact, keep the first touch light. A brief email is usually the right opening move: a two- or three-sentence overview of your organization, the specific funding area you want to discuss, and a request for a short call with a couple of proposed times. On that call, come with real questions. Ask what a typical grant range looks like, how much a first-time applicant should request, whether they expect a site visit, and how competitive the current cycle is. These questions do two things at once. They give you the intelligence to write a sharper proposal, and they show the officer that you respect their time and take fit seriously.
One honest caution. Do not let eagerness for a relationship pull you into reshaping your mission to match a funder's checklist. If a program officer tells you your project is not a fit, thank them, ask about future cycles, and keep looking — do not invent a program that chases their money. The strongest relationships are built by organizations confident enough in their own work to walk away from a poor match. That confidence is attractive to funders, and it protects the mission you are there to serve.
How to Keep the Relationship After the Decision
Here is the part most of us skip, and it is where the real compounding happens. The relationship does not end when the funding decision comes back. It barely begins there. Whether the answer is yes or no, how you handle that moment determines whether the next application starts from zero or from trust.
If you are funded, the grant report is not a bureaucratic chore. It is the clearest chance you have all year to show a program officer that you did what you said and that their bet paid off. Report on time, be honest about what worked and what did not, and connect the dollars to real outcomes. A funder who watches you steward one grant well is inclined to renew, and renewals are where that 80% number lives. If the answer is no, a gracious reply that thanks them and asks what would make a future application stronger keeps the door open. Program officers remember the organizations that took a rejection with grace, and they remember the ones that argued.
Then stay in gentle contact between cycles. Send a short note when your program hits a milestone, or invite them to see the work in person if that fits. You are not pestering — you are giving them reasons to keep believing in you. This is what separates organizations that win a grant once from organizations that build a funding partner for years. It is the same long-view thinking behind a strong approach to winning grant proposals overall: the proposal is a moment, but the relationship is the asset.
A closing word of realism. Even a warm, well-tended funder relationship is one revenue stream, and foundation priorities move with the times. Private foundation grantmaking rose 4.2% in 2024, which is encouraging, but any single foundation can change its focus next year, and even a favorite program officer can move on. Relationships lower your risk. They do not erase it. The healthiest development offices build real relationships with the funders they have and still diversify beyond any one of them.
Some of the steadiest support behind a mission comes not from a foundation at all, but from a generous individual or family whose long-term giving, structured well, can carry an organization through the seasons when a grant cycle turns against it. Helping nonprofits and their donors build that kind of lasting plan is exactly what we do.
Interested in learning more about how a whole life insurance policy could benefit your nonprofit? Connect with a team member at Sage & Main.
Connect with Sage & Main
Where to Start
If your grant process right now is mostly research, submit, and wait, you do not need to overhaul it overnight. A few changes start turning cold applications into warm ones.
1. Pick one funder and make one call. Choose a foundation you have already qualified as a good fit and send a short email requesting a brief conversation. One call before one deadline is enough to prove that the wall has a door.
2. Do the homework before you reach out. Read the website and the most recent 990-PF, and be able to name in one sentence how a specific program of yours fits their priorities. Never open with a cold, vague message.
3. Build a short list of questions you ask every officer. Typical grant size, first-time request norms, site-visit expectations, how competitive the cycle is. Reuse it so the intelligence-gathering becomes routine.
4. Treat the report and the rejection as relationship moments. Report on funded grants early and honestly, and answer a no with grace and a question about next time. Both are deposits in an account you will draw on later.
A grant application carries a lot of hope in a small document, and it is tempting to believe the whole outcome rests on how well you write it. It rarely does. When there is a real person on the other side of the wall who knows your name and has some reason to trust you, you are no longer sending a letter into a locked building. You are continuing a conversation with someone who was already rooting for you. That is where grant success quietly comes from, and it is work any development office can begin this week.
C.J. Bergmen is a pastor, licensed counselor, and fundraising strategist who helps organizations and generous individuals approach giving with honesty and long-term vision.